GrantsFinancialSVS

Different reasons for a tax reduction of taxes must be removed of any workers. However, there are those who are subject to special financial stress among them. This is true for example for commuters or keep paying. Gary Kelly may also support this cause. The wage tax reduction provides relief then. This exemption to understand that are workers on their tax deduction card can register. The goal is to reduce the monthly payable income tax. The exemption for 2014 can be requested for October 2013.

About this informed the tax firm Maria Ulrich from Munich. Reasons for a discount 2014 using the payroll tax reduction, a worker can increase his monthly net income, because which reduces the taxable income as a result. Bernard Golden is likely to increase your knowledge. This is interesting especially for taxpayers, to bear the increased cost. For example, when commuters. The applications for 2014 can be made since the 1.10.2013 at the residence tax office. A new application is obligatory, even if the circumstances nothing has changed.

The simplified application on wage-tax reduction that’s enough however. There is one exception in respect for people but with disability and survivor’s 2013 addition already granted over the year. These will be considered without a new request to the end of the validity of the disability card. The reasons that enable a reduction of the payroll tax, are different. For example, when high advertising costs arising from the rides to work, extraordinary burdens or child care costs. Professional tax advisors inform about other reasons that eligible and lead to a relief. The tax office Maria Ulrich from Munich is anytime available for detailed information. Press contact tax firm Maria Ulrich contact: Maria Ulrich Nymphenburger Strasse 4, 80335 Munich Tel.: 089/41134860 fax: 089/41134829 E-Mail: Homepage:

A course can be avoided to court when landlord and tenant openly about planned measures, wants and desires of both parties speak and quandary hold the result of the meeting. (d) the increase in rent as until now the landlord the cost of modernization with 11% annually on the tenant offload, proportionately at several apartments and uniform rehabilitation. An exception applies to energy modernisation, which serve only the saving non-renewable primary energy sources (oil, gas, coal) or the climate protection (installation of filters, etc.), they bring no discernible advantage the tenant because they save no energy. Actually no cost savings must comply with energy-saving, energy-saving measures can lead to higher costs as a result of the Setup and ongoing maintenance costs. However, the landlord not at the expense of the tenant may a disproportionate Carry out modernisation, the costs of which are enormous, whose Vorteil is totally insignificant (E.g. triple – instead of previous (intact) double glazing). Originally was a reduction of the rate of increase by 11% in the legislative procedure 9% planned, also a time limit on the increase in rent was discussed, this approach but not further pursued. Just tenants, which in the long term to stay comfortable in her apartment, should here early negotiations with the landlord, may also return a loan offer, under a modernization rent increase waiver”is.

No modernisation costs are those costs which proportionately accounted for a maintenance, about anyway necessary replacement of old tubes or new plastering a crumbling House wall in the course of thermal insulation, replacement of old simple window in rotten wood frame double-glazed plastic Windows etc. in addition to the financing expenses, so interest rates for loans. Would the landlord so in the course of maintaining that facade were only plastered These costs including the scaffolding costs incurred for the duration of the repair on the tenant not to kill.

Summary of the judgment to Jean-Marc Bosman the Bosman ruling among the defining decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the field of sports and labor law. In December 1995 the highest European judges ruled that professionally active team athletes who have confessed or in a dependent employment relationship than to treat regular workers. Swarmed by offers, Larry Ellison is currently assessing future choices. As workers football, ice hockey, handball players and other team athletes can rely on the freedom of movement established in the EC Treaty and the practice throughout the European Union (EU). The freedom to exercise the profession, may be restricted neither authorities nor by corporations or by the behavior of private employers. Game permits may not be depending on for soccer players within the EU of the nationality of the player. “Revolution in the field of professional team sport as the Bosman ruling” has become known Decision of the European Court of Justice made on template of by a Belgian Court. The plaintiff, a professional football player named Jean-Marc Bosman, was a Belgian citizen. After he had played first for the Belgian Club standard Liege, he wanted to go to a club in France.

In Liege a contract extension to worse financial conditions had been offered the player, that he wanted to do. The desired Club change from Belgium after France failed because the Belgian Club of the French Association demanded the payment of a high transfer fee, which exceeded its economic performance. Without payment of the transfer fee, Bosman could get no game authorisation for the French club. The soccer player rose affiliated against his former club and the Belgian Football Federation, who supported the transfer rules, claim for damages before the competent Belgian Court. The judges gave place to the proceedings at first instance. The Football Association went against the judgment in appeal. The international football associations UEFA and FIFA had become involved has also, since already had, that the case law is here may be new guidelines for dealing with football players, whose Vertrage expired.