Auer Witte Thiel informed: operating expenses even when formal defects effective Munich August 2011. The Supreme Court clarified the existing rules on the operating expenses. The federal judge found that the settlement in the case of formal defects remains valid and the tenant must pay the costs of payments. Thus, the BGH repeals contrary decisions of administrative and Court and ended a legal dispute lasting since 2006. The firm Auer Witte Thiel from Munich reported the verdict. Individual formal defects in the operating costs will not lead to the invalidity of the payment claims to a tenant. Among other things, an operating expenses also set too high or too low payments or attached target instead is payments remains valid.
This noted the Federal Supreme Court in a recent decision, and thus drew the line under a 2006 law dispute. In the present case, the lessor shall on payment of 1,247 euro and interest complained. The amount comprised the in the fiscal year but be deducted from paid advances amounting to 1,025 euro 2005 accumulated heating and water costs and other expenses, which amounted to 2,272 euros, were. The District Court dismissed the action of the lessor due to formal defects. But according to the BGH, the tenants of his payment obligations despite poor operating expenses must comply. The competent District Court misconstrues that substantive and formal defects affect the comprehensibility of the Bill does not in any case; the LG over-sheet therefore the requirements that should be put on a settlement.
Not billable, but specified in the document costs be although a lack of content, the statement of operating costs but still keep their effectiveness, was the Supreme Court. In addition, the federal judge noted that formal defects affecting individual cost items, unimpaired, then release the validity the settlement if the hirer clearly can read out from the list. Also disagreed with the Supreme Court of the decision of the Court, the had judged, the calculations of the prepayments were not traceable and the settlement was accordingly invalid for formal reasons. On this traceability it can’t, so the German Federal Supreme Court. It was only material errors which justify no ineffectiveness of operating expenses for formal reasons. Auer Witte Thiel lawyers to review the current decision as important strengthening of the legal position of the landlord and owner. At this point, Auer Witte Thiel regularly report on current legal decisions in the law of tenancy. Get more information about Auer Witte Thiel and current rulings in the law of tenancy here under. About Auer Witte Thiel, the specialization areas of focus and the development of core competencies in certain disciplines are indispensable in the legal services sector. Auer Witte Thiel represents a wide variety of housing companies, property managers and condominium communities in the area rental, real estate and construction law.
The tax office home from Augsburg informed by the combined assessment to income tax are taxable spouses, not permanently separated living, gives tax. Cooperation investment in the context of spouse splitting the legislature ties however, certain prerequisites. In particular the entering into a new life community preclude you, as the Augsburg tax firm depicts the example of a recent decision of the FG Cologne, Germany. The Cologne Tax Court recently on the action of a husband on collaboration investment with his, in a nursing home had accommodated in PVS, wife to decide. To take care of two children with his wife and to financial management, the husband had recorded a woman for Board and lodging.
He gave it financial management across as housekeeper, although she had a child by him during the disputed period. The competent tax office the consent to the disposition of the cooperation, denied it is because here his opinion to a new community and no employment acted, which living and economic community of spouses was dissolved. The Cologne tax court first found that the PVS must stand the wife of cooperation investment not in the way. Rather, it is important for the existence of a matrimonial life and economic community that the spouses so long remained committed to this also against obstacles, until she could fully live on. If the spouses lived permanently separated from each other and therefore no cooperation investment into consideration would be, was to make depending on their behavior. The Court still stressed that it was impossible to run side by side more life and economic communities.
By the applicant husband have decided to live with the mother of the new child, he finished the marital life and economic community with his wife. He live at least since the birth of the child in permanent separation from the wife, what would be a combined investment with her not taken into consideration. The Cologne judge gave a verdict in the To federal fiscal court to step in, it can be considered if the entering into of two concurrent life and economic communities is allowed due to the special circumstances of the plaintiff. From the judgment of the Cologne Finance Court, it is clear that the spouse splitting has its limits in the stock of conjugal life and economic community. When exactly this dissolves, decides not lump-sum, but according to the circumstances of the individual case. The consultation of a tax law specialist is strongly advised, to gain clarity here concerned. The Augsburg tax firm is committed with their years of experience for this, its best to enforce the interests of their clients in this and all other tax issues home.
New ruling on consumer protection when flight delays Hamburg, 14.02.2011 – the Darmstadt regional court has sentenced the airline Condor to pay a compensation of 600 euros according to Regulation (EC) No 261 / 2004 on a passenger as a result of a delayed flight. The passenger had booked a flight from Halifax/Canada to Frankfurt/Main with the airline Condor. Reaching Frankfurt but not at the scheduled arrival time, but 17 hours late the next day. Therefore, he asked the compensation provided for by the EC regulation of EUR 600, which will be paid by a cancelled flight of Condor. Condor refused the payment. The airline said the flight was only delayed, not cancelled.
The delay have also relies on an unpredictable technical defect; This exceptional circumstance would be against the payment obligation. The Landgericht Darmstadt (AZ. 7 S 29/09) decided on the 03.11.2010 in favour of the passenger. A long delay is a cancellation of a flight within the meaning the regulation right. This concludes the Court from the case-law of the European Court of Justice (judgment of November 19, 2009, AZ.) (C-402/07 and C-432/07) as well as the Federal Court of Justice (judgment of February 18, 2010, AZ.) XA ZR 95/06). A technical malfunction was basically no exceptional circumstance, which accounts for the payment of compensation would allow even if it would be a very unusual and rarely occurring fault.
For defects on the aircraft, the airline is responsible, especially since it’s manageable defects, which are caused by not acting by external event (E.g. bird strike). Lawyer Henning Stoffregen, who has represented the passenger against Condor, explains this: Delays and cancellations of flights mean a major annoyance for passengers. The EC Regulation wants to secure their rights and oblige the airline to comply with the flight plans. The judgment makes it clear that is the airlines generally not with technical defects for a delayed or cancelled flight can apologize. Although the District Court expressly approved the revision to the Federal Supreme Court, the opposing party thereof has not made use, to avoid a negative impact through a hochstrichterliches judgment. Passengers are strongly recommended to request the rights against the airline cancelled or delayed flights due to the case-law. The compensation is often substantial, especially in comparison to the actual airfare.” The plaintiff was represented in the proceedings before the Landgericht Darmstadt by the Hamburg-based law firm lawyers DIEKMANN. The reasons for judgment have published under. DIEKMANN lawyers DIEKMANN is a Hamburg-based law firm of five lawyers, focused on all areas of national and international business law in particular of capital market law, company law, attorneys at law of intellectual property law, European law and of the related tax issues. Contact: Henning Stoffregen DIEKMANN lawyers Ballindamm 35 20095 Hamburg phone 040/33 44 36 90 fax 040/33 44 36 99 E-Mail:
Consequence – consequence – consequence – consequence if you want to be truly debt-free, you have to act consistently. If you want it, you make it also. And that with the help of a lawyer who intercedes for you. If you do not consistently, let stay easy there! Then, others define but about you. I mean it really! With debt, I mean not the loans you have except for the purchase of the House, not the loan you have applied for car purchases carefully. I mean the debt that slowly have accumulated in your. And the more debt, in which you now further stumble into. Because the next year vacation pay.
And at Christmas, you want to be in the family also no slouch himself. And easily, these bills can pay off in the shipping House with low rates, or? Is quite light and seductive. And already the over-indebtedness has occurred. You can no longer comply with the current payment obligations with your normal monthly income. And you’re in the personal bankruptcy.
(On the edge: If your friend so specify in their cunning purchased only goods on rates, then pay more OT, and then applied for bankruptcy and out are now fine, because they must have the goods and no longer pay, so you do not believe them.) Because personal bankruptcy is not funny at all; and also not beneficial!.) Read something about this insolvency with remaining debts. Then you will be informed. You will be amazed! And something else: you don’t believe those who want to help you to be debt-free overnight! You want only your best! Before it is ready, pull the brake. Right now. Immediately I mean immediately, and while right now! Arrange your entire accounting documents, enumerate the remaining debts. And with the computer that you have purchased perhaps on rates. Make an appointment with a good lawyer. This is committed if you also pay him, for you. And then you are actually in quite some time, if you are consistent with the workings of the debt, debt-free. I as a lawyer can’t say what your lawyer will take, I don’t know your case, your debt level of course. But he’s going to make it right. But you must, as pointed out above, consistently act. You will have only advantages. If you don’t want that, you do not start. Then others will determine but your finances! And that is not to your advantage. Your lawyer will recommend you maybe also a debt restructuring. Consider that along with it! This can have advantages. Test the credit offers with your lawyer. Mosquito Konrad Attorney