The use of films and parallels the books is an activity very condizente, therefore it works the slight knowledge of intertextualidade and intersemiose that they contribute for one better agreement of the aesthetic workmanship, as suggests the PCNs and Martins. However we verify that the activities more used by the professor are script of reading and study of text. These activities are white of critical for the scholars for if constituting in practical desestimulantes, where it will appear that the text is used only as excuse to carry through tiring exercises, moreover, the script of reading it can trim the possibilities of experimentation of the text for the reader, since in the literary reading if it restores a species of game where the said author the rules and the reader goes in search of its meanings. In the fifth and last questioning, we ask where measured the professor it finds that the curricular contents limit the work in the concretion of the objectives for this education. The professor clarified that he is very limited in some points, mensionando that the time is insufficient for the great amount of contents; the books more focam the study of the literary schools what it becomes desestimulante more for the pupils; the difficulty in if working any literary composition are great since the school does not make use of enough amount of units. We observe, with regard to the insufficient time, that if deals with three years and, as they guide the PCNs, if the contents was organized of form to remove of the resume what it is abundant as the study of the literary schools and to include more readings of workmanships the time would be enough to introduce literary letramento that estimates the reading for all the life. But, for in such a way, the investment in books is necessary so that the libraries have a good quantity.